So you could simply say "Yhy ho kȧ mȧkja gyzan," (I saw no girl) or double it up, "Yhy ho kȧ" mȧkja ny" gyzan." (I didn't see no girl). You can never use to negatives to cancel each other in Wymysorys. So you're free to use single negation all the time if you wish, but it's also perfectly standard to use multiple negatives to intensify the meaning. Single negation, as is most common for West Germanic languages, and negative concord, which was ported into the language as a result of centuries of close contact with Polish. One example of negation that I like is from Wymysorys, a Germanic language that has two complementary systems of negation. Lots of languages let you negate how you please without any of the prescriptivist bitching. And I believe double negatives are cross-linguistically more common. I've meet several people who will actually stop you in the middle of a conversation to tell your that "your double negatives actually produce affirmative statements, so you shouldn't use them." Which is of course possible in many dialects of English but that doesn't make any differing dialect less correct. Likewise, using "not" with an adjective with a negative derivational morpheme has the same effect as simply negating any other adjective.Įdit: typos (I need to stop writing such long, unwieldy sentences) In such languages, repeating the same form of negation - like the word for "not" - negates the negative, creating a positive sentence. nothing, nowhere) in a sentence with a negated verb. something, somewhere) must be negative (e.g. In all languages with negative concord that I have some knowledge of (Spanish, Russian, Turkish, Korean), the requirement for negative concord simply demands that any indefinite pronouns, adjectives, or adverbs (e.g. So if I understand your question correctly, you're asking if such a phrase would be interpreted in languages with negative concord the same as it would be in English, correct?Īs far as I know, that is indeed the case. However, you bring up an interesting point in the fact that a phrase like "not unhappy" includes two productive negation morphemes, "not" and "un-". u/raendrop is right that "not incapable" is not exactly the same as "capable", especially when the pragmatics of how each is usually used is taken into account. Whosever invokes the name of □□□□□□□□□□ should do so in appropriately typeset form. Preferably this will be on the side of pure bloody-mindedness about the badlinguistics than just the usual refusal of people to listen to anyone else on the internet. Posts or comments submitted for /r/badlinguistics should show a level of obstinateness for the comments or posts being submitted: Ideally, a case of badlinguistics should be about someone who is just rusted on to their badlinguistics, and is refusing to change their opinion in the face of all other evidence. Submissions must have a sufficient level of badlinguistics content - If there's not much content, it goes in the Small Posts Thread.ĭon't submit just plainly ignorant posts: People can be ignorant, we know this, but someone just saying something stupid in one comment is not a good submission by itself. There is a moratorium on "literally", "could care less", 'untranslatable words', and cultural appropriation posts - don't post these. No-one cares if someone is using a word strangely, or if their pronunciation of something is different.ĭo not submit meta threads without mod approval. Failure to follow the rules will end with the removal of your submission or comment and - at the moderator's discretion - a possible ban. Don't tag people who are subjects of the post in comments. Explanations posted by other commenters are welcome, but do not fulfill this rule. There is a one hour grace period, and the R4 must be by the original submitter. R4: The submitter must provide a top-level comment explanation of why something is badlinguistics when you post it. R3: Don't submit threads you've posted in. R2: Don't vote or comment in linked threads. R1: Do not make discriminatory or prejudiced posts or comments. The repository for all the worst linguistics-related content of Reddit and the Internet.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |